QUALITY HEALTHCARE -EASIER ACCESS
Goal: In Complex Problems
-provide timely access and continuity of care
PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS TO
CONSIDER
Easy phone access
to real time and scheduled phone conferencing - between local provider,
patient and specialist (team). Patient and local provider are face to
face. In chronic or potentially urgent or costly problems - conferencing
is arranged with one call at first encounter. Early correct diagnosis
and better interventions can be achieved this way. Patient spared much
grief. Phone mentored exams are used. Proactive assessment is made attractive
to all Adapt current best practices and tools. Usual referral patterns
and local control encouraged. This is a multi-specialty clinic without
walls. The model can be adapted by and with existing infrastructures
without major startup costs. Please refer to details and charts:


How this system
would work
1) One call from
primary provider to call center triggers personalized screening/decision
process. This call states problem or concern and requests immediate
interaction with specialist or advise re: mini-data sets or clinical
pathways directions. Can apply model at specialty clinics, schools and
private office settings.
2) Call center or specialists office responds-with progressive additional
phone/fax/e-mail data to prepare for efficient use of phone conference
of team. Ex. Templates/screening tools, case manager expertise, web
based protocols etc.
3) Phone conference scheduled. Provision for continuity to deal with
change is provided with same approach. When needed-interaction of participants
with existing grand rounds is arranged. Options for second opinion and
trial scenarios discussions are included. Managed scheduling can provide
24-hour real-time (within 15 minutes) and scheduled time access/interaction
between patient, local provider and expert. With a large group this
is doable.
Advantages of
the system
One call triggers
process. Lowest level available technology can be used. Prompter, more
personalized access to needed information and choice of best intervention.
History is the engine that drives the decision making process. Model
incorporates practical ways of data input to include physical, psychological,
social, work/school and random elements. Also to summarize and display
data graphically -time/flow charts which assists in analysis and outcome
assessment.
Case Examples
A woman in her 30's
with recurrent abdominal cramps, vomiting over several years, had upper
GI, barium enema, other test and numerous treatments by internist and
psychiatrist over 10 years. Symptoms continued. With our system, an
initial, brief screening history done at her doctor's office and then
an examination would be followed with one call to call center-interactive
FAX screening questionnaires from gastroenterologist. This would identify
possible lactose intolerance promptly. She responded to dietary restrictions.
A 50-year old woman
with two-year history of mild left sided weakness and chest pressure.
Three hospitalizations in intensive care and coronary care units with
extensive evaluations over a total of 18 days. No cardiac disease found.
Symptoms of periodic dizziness, depression and passing out, persisted.
MRI of the head revealed small, old stroke. Two years after onset, electroencephalogram
revealed seizure activity and she improved promptly with seizure medication
treatment. With our system, phone conferencing from emergency room or
intensive care unit-with a neurologist, internist and patient would
have led to diagnosis before or at first hospital admission.
Some other specialty
applications for this model
Gastroenterology, oncology, endocrinology, orthopedics -others.
Pilot Study -We
can prospectively demonstrate (with actuarial data) how a low budget
will reduce costs significantly in a 6 months trial.
Frequently Asked
Questions - brief answers
Facilitated continuity
of care - with this model can be a marketing tool.
Who Pays?
-Savings generated by decreased waste, defined contributions, other
options, Legal questions? - The access to ongoing corrective feedback
via ease of phone and other prompt communication decreases the potential
for legal problems. Usual referral patterns supported-other detailed
solutions available How to motivate providers? Decrease stress, and
provide better quality healthcare.: Have providers participate actively
in decisions and development of changes.
Summary
We emphasize strengthening
the weakest links. This means making available timely live communication
to all -the telephone-(supplemented by other technology). Other tools
in this model can help better deal with the challenges of: costs, local
control, quality and continuity of care, legal issues, data input-compression,
summary, and display graphically, helping achieve changes in provider
behavior, and building on existing advances.
For more information
please contact:
Isaac N Silberman M.D.
INSROZ@PRODIGY.NET
tel: (415) 235-7805
www.dtphope.net